• Spine J · Jul 2018

    Radiological risk factors for progression of ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament following laminoplasty.

    • Dong-Ho Lee, Jae Hwan Cho, Nam-Heun Kim, Sunghoo Kim, Jeonghyun Choi, Chang Ju Hwang, and Choon Sung Lee.
    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1, PungNap-2-dong, SongPa-gu, Seoul, South Korea.
    • Spine J. 2018 Jul 1; 18 (7): 1116-1121.

    Background ContextResearch shows the progression of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) following decompressive surgery for cervical myelopathy, particularly in cases presenting with continuous or mixed radiographic types. To date, no study has investigated OPLL progression within each motion segment.PurposeTo evaluate progression of cervical OPLL in each motion segment using a novel system of classification, and to identify risk factors for OPLL progression following laminoplasty.Study Design/SettingRetrospective case series.Patient SampleThis study included 34 patients (86 segments) with cervical myelopathy secondary to OPLL.Outcome MeasuresClinical and radiological data (plain radiographs and computed tomography [CT]) were obtained.MethodsClinical data from 34 patients (86 segments) with cervical myelopathy secondary to OPLL were evaluated retrospectively. All subjects had undergone laminoplasty at a single center. Sagittal reconstructive CT images were used to measure OPLL thickness in each segment. Ossified masses were classified into four types according to the degree of disc space involvement: type 1 (no involvement); type 2 (involving disc space but not crossing); type 3 (crossing disc space but not fused); and type 4 (complete bridging). Range of motion (ROM) for each segment was measured using dynamic radiographs. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the degree of OPLL progression according to the four disc space involvement types and ROM.ResultsMean OPLL progression was significantly higher in types 2 (1.3 mm) and 3 (1.5 mm) than in type 1 (0.5 mm) (p<.001). Severe progression (change in thickness >2 mm) was more frequent in types 2 (8 of 29) and 3 (7 of 16) than in types 1 (1 of 35) or 4 (0 of 6) (p=.002). In types 2 or 3, ROM>5° was correlated with severe OPLL progression (52% vs. 8%; p=.035).ConclusionsType 2 or 3 disc involvement and segmental ROM>5° were risk factors for OPLL progression. Classification of cervical OPLL according to disc involvement may help predict OPLL progression following laminoplasty. Close follow-up is warranted in cases of type 2 or 3 with greater segmental motion.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.