• Alan Priester, Holden Wu, Pooria Khoshnoodi, Douglas Schneider, Zhaohuan Zhang, Nazanin H Asvadi, Anthony Sisk, Steven Raman, Robert Reiter, Warren Grundfest, Leonard S Marks, and Shyam Natarajan.
• IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2019 Jan 1; 66 (1): 14-22.

ObjectiveThis investigation was performed to evaluate the registration accuracy between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pathology using three-dimensional (3-D) printed molds.MethodsTissue-mimicking prostate phantoms were manufactured with embedded fiducials. The fiducials were used to measure and compare target registration error (TRE) between phantoms that were sliced by hand versus phantoms that were sliced within 3-D-printed molds. Subsequently, ten radical prostatectomy specimens were placed inside molds, scanned with MRI, and then sliced. The ex vivo scan was used to assess the true location of whole mount (WM) slides relative to in vivo MRI. The TRE between WM and in vivo MRI was measured using anatomic landmarks.ResultsManually sliced phantoms had a 4.1-mm mean TRE, whereas mold-sliced phantoms had a 1.9-mm mean TRE. Similarly, mold-assisted slicing reduced mean angular misalignment around the left-right (LR) anatomic axis from 10.7° to 4.5°. However, ex vivo MRI revealed that excised prostates were misaligned within molds, including a mean 14° rotation about the LR axis. The mean in-plane TRE was 3.3 mm using molds alone and 2.2 mm after registration was corrected with ex vivo MRI.ConclusionPatient-specific molds improved accuracy relative to manual slicing techniques in a phantom model. However, the registration accuracy of surgically resected specimens was limited by their imperfect fit within molds. This limitation can be overcome with the addition of ex vivo imaging.SignificanceThe accuracy of 3-D-printed molds was characterized, quantifying their utility for facilitating MRI-pathology registration.

16 keywords...

hide…