-
- Irfan Ismail Ayub, Anant Mohan, Karan Madan, Vijay Hadda, Deepali Jain, G C Khilnani, and Randeep Guleria.
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Porur, Chennai, India.
- Clin Respir J. 2018 Feb 1; 12 (2): 681-690.
ObjectiveReliable differentiation of benign from malignant mediastinal lymphadenopathy is important, especially in countries with a high tuberculosis burden. We hypothesized that specific sonographic features on endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS) may differentiate benign from malignant nodes. In this study, the sonographic features of non-malignant and malignant nodes were compared.MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of patients with intrathoracic lymphadenopathy who underwent EBUS-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA). Sonographic features such as nodal size, margin (distinct or indistinct), echogenicity (heterogeneous or homogeneous), and presence or absence of calcification, a central hilar structure, coagulation necrosis sign, and nodal conglomeration were recorded and compared in the 2 groups.ResultsDuring the study period, a diagnosis of tuberculosis (n = 71), sarcoidosis (n = 63), and malignancy (n = 36) was made in 170 patients by EBUS-TBNA. A total of 312 lymph node stations were examined. Presence of central hilar structure (15.6% versus 4%, P = .03) and the presence of nodal conglomeration (27.5% versus 8%, P < .01) were significantly higher in benign nodes. Further, logistic regression analysis revealed that the presence of well-defined nodal margins, the presence of central hilar structure, and the presence of conglomeration of lymph nodes were independent predictive factors for the diagnosis of benign mediastinal lymphadenopathy.ConclusionSonographic features of well-defined margins, presence of central hilar structure, and presence of nodal conglomeration in the lymph nodes on EBUS are predictive of benign disease.© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.