• Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc · May 2019

    Good clinical and radiological results of total knee arthroplasty using varus valgus constrained or rotating hinge implants in ligamentous laxity.

    • Eric Röhner, Kathrin Benad, Timo Zippelius, Nadja Kloss, Benjamin Jacob, Julia Kirschberg, and Georg Matziolis.
    • Department of Orthopedics, Jena University Hospital, Campus Eisenberg, Klosterlausnitzer Straße 81, 07607, Eisenberg, Germany. e.roehner@waldkliniken-eisenberg.de.
    • Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 May 1; 27 (5): 1665-1670.

    PurposeThe optimal degree of constraint of a total knee arthroplasty for treatment of knee osteoarthritis with ligamentous laxity is under debate. While varus valgus constrained knees require a minimum level of ligamentous stability, rotating hinge knees can even be implanted if the collateral ligaments have been lost completely. It seems plausible that joint kinematics are determined by implant design in rotating hinge knees, whereas varus valgus constrained knees may be influenced by remaining stabilizers. This may result in more predictable clinical results of hinge knees. The hypothesis of the present study, therefore, was that stability and clinical outcome are better after total knee arthroplasty using rotating hinge knees than after using varus valgus constrained knees.MethodsAll patients who were treated using a mobile-bearing varus valgus constrained knee or a rotating hinge knee for treatment of end-stage osteoarthritis and ligamentous laxity were included. At follow-up, clinical scores were determined (WOMAC, VAS, KSS, FJS, Lysholm). Furthermore, body mass index, operating time, and postoperative complications were documented. Whole leg radiographs as well as patella axial radiographs were analyzed for implant alignment and patella tracking.ResultsEighty-five patients were included in this retrospective study. Both groups showed an average range of motion of 113°. No significant difference between the two groups was observed for any of the scores recorded. In the rotating hinge knee group, a more precise tibia positioning in relation to the mechanical axis but also a significant lateralisation and tilting of the patella were seen, compared with the varus valgus constrained knee group.ConclusionsRotating hinge knees did not perform better than mobile-bearing varus valgus constrained knees clinically. Both prosthesis types showed equally good clinical outcomes with regard to stability, mobility, satisfaction, pain and operating time.Level Of EvidenceRetrospective case series, Level IV.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…