• Sarah M Chilenski, Daniel F Perkins, Jonathan Olson, Lesa Hoffman, Mark E Feinberg, Mark Greenberg, Janet Welsh, D Max Crowley, and Richard Spoth.
• Prevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, United States; The Clearinghouse for Military Family Readiness, The Pennsylvania State University, United States. Electronic address: sem268@psu.edu.
• Eval Program Plann. 2016 Feb 1; 54: 19-29.

BackgroundHistorically, effectiveness of community collaborative prevention efforts has been mixed. Consequently, research has been undertaken to better understand the factors that support their effectiveness; theory and some related empirical research suggests that the provision of technical assistance is one important supporting factor. The current study examines one aspect of technical assistance that may be important in supporting coalition effectiveness, the collaborative relationship between the technical assistance provider and site lead implementer.MethodsFour and one-half years of data were collected from technical assistance providers and prevention team members from the 14 community prevention teams involved in the PROSPER project.ResultsSpearman correlation analyses with longitudinal data show that the levels of the collaborative relationship during one phase of collaborative team functioning associated with characteristics of internal team functioning in future phases.ConclusionsResults suggest that community collaborative prevention work should consider the collaborative nature of the technical assistance provider - prevention community team relationship when designing and conducting technical assistance activities, and it may be important to continually assess these dynamics to support high quality implementation.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

13 keywords...

hide…