-
Gastroent Hepat Barc · Oct 2004
Review[Population screening for colorectal cancer: a systematic review].
- L Paz-Valiñas and G Atienza Merino.
- Axencia de Avaliación de Tecnoloxías Sanitarias de Galicia (avalia-t), Subdirección Xeral de Planificación Sanitaria e Aseguramento, Servicio Galego de Saúde, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain. lucinda.paz.valinas@sergas.es
- Gastroent Hepat Barc. 2004 Oct 1; 27 (8): 450-9.
IntroductionColorectal cancer (CRC) is a serious public health problem due to its high frequency and the mortality it provokes. This disease presents a series of characteristics that make it an ideal candidate for population screening. The aim of the present study was to analyze current knowledge on the efficacy/effectiveness of CRC screening through the fecal occult blood test (FOBT), rectosigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy in individuals without symptoms of this disease.MethodWe performed a systematic review of the literature on each of the methods of early detection. The databases consulted were MEDLINE and PREMEDLINE (1966-2002), Embase (1980-2002), HTA and Cochrane, among others. Articles were selected using explicit criteria and were classified according to their level of scientific evidence.ResultsThe best validated test is the FOBT, with the greatest number of randomized controlled trials. The results on the sensitivity and specificity of this test and reduction in mortality from CRC varied widely, depending on the technique used. The decrease in mortality from CRC in groups that underwent screening through FOBT was between 15% and 33%. The number and quality of the studies performed to evaluate flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy as methods of early detection were much lower. Although the rate of detection of polyps is greater than with the FOBT, the value of these tests as screening techniques has not been analyzed through randomized controlled trials.ConclusionPopulation screening for CRC reduces mortality from this disease. However, consensus is lacking on the screening method of choice and on the frequency with which screening should be performed. The method best supported by the evidence as a primary detection test is the FOBT. To date, sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy should be used as diagnostic tests only, mainly because of their invasiveness.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.