• Am. J. Clin. Nutr. · Oct 2020

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Effectiveness of a normative nutrition intervention in Chilean pregnant women on maternal and neonatal outcomes: the CHiMINCs study.

    • Maria Luisa Garmendia, Camila Corvalan, Marcela Araya, Paola Casanello, Juan Pedro Kusanovic, and Ricardo Uauy.
    • Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology (INTA), University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
    • Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2020 Oct 1; 112 (4): 991-1001.

    BackgroundSome nutritional interventions have shown their efficacy in reducing gestational weight gain (GWG); however, their applicability in routine care is limited.ObjectiveWe assessed the effectiveness of a low-intensity and high-coverage nutritional intervention on maternal and offspring outcomes; the intervention enhanced existing nutritional health care standards and practices at the primary health care level in Chile.MethodsThis study was a cluster-randomized controlled trial of 12 primary health care centers (PHCCs) from Santiago, Chile. PHCCs were randomly allocated to either nutritional intervention [intervention group (IG), n = 5] or routine care [control group (CG), n = 7]. A total of 4631 pregnant women were recruited (IG, n = 2565; and CG, n = 2066). Primary outcomes were adequate GWG and glycemic control in mothers and birth weight, birth length, macrosomia, and large for gestational age in neonates. The intervention consisted of 4 key actions: training of health care professionals on nutritional recommendations, counseling of pregnant women on diet and physical activity recommendations, offering a physical activity program implemented in the participating PHCCs, and adequate referral to dietitians. Women randomly assigned to the CG received routine antenatal care.ResultsAt baseline, the mean age was 26.1 y; 45% of women were primipara and 24% were obese. No differences were found in the percentage of women achieving adequate GWG (IG: 30.3%, compared with CG: 31.3%; OR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.81, 1.09), but women in the IG had lower GWG than those in the CG (11.3 compared with 11.9 kg; mean difference: -0.63 kg; 95% CI: -1.19, -0.08). Effects of the intervention were significantly higher in women with obesity at the begining of pregnancy (mean difference: -1.24 kg; 95% CI: -2.18, -0.30; P for interaction < 0.05). No differences were found between groups regarding maternal glycemic control or neonatal outcomes.ConclusionsOur findings demonstrate that a low-intensity, high-coverage intervention delivered through the Chilean public health care system under standard operating conditions reduces GWG and has the potential for successful scale-up. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01916603.Copyright © The Author(s) on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2020.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.