• C Cesana, E Regazzi, D Garau, C Caramatti, L Mangoni, and V Rizzoli.
• Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Milano), Italy.
• Haematologica. 1999 Sep 1; 84 (9): 771-8.

Background And ObjectiveSince limited data concerning quantitative and qualitative differences of CD34+ cells collected after different mobilization schedules are available, we investigated phenotype, proliferative capacity and primitive progenitor cell content of CD34+ cells mobilized with four different regimens.Design And MethodsThe number, phenotype, and progenitor cell content of CD34+ cells were investigated in 46 patients mobilized with cyclophosphamide (CY) 7 g/m(2) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, 5 microg/kg) (CY7+G-CSF) (n=16), CY 4 g/m(2) plus G-CSF (CY4+G-CSF) (n=8), IVE [ifosphamide (2.5 g/m(2) for 3 d), etoposide (150 mg/m(2) for 3 d), epirubicin (100 mg/m(2) on day 1)] plus G-CSF (IVE+G-CSF) (n=9), or G-CSF (10 microg/kg) alone (n=13).ResultsThe number of CD34+ cells collected per liter of processed blood was significantly higher in the CY7+G-CSF group than in the CY4+G-CSF and G-CSF groups (p Interpretation And ConclusionsOur data demonstrate that: (i) different mobilization regimens allow the collection of CD34+ cells with distinct phenotypic and proliferative features; (ii) evaluation of the absolute number of CD34+ cells by itself is not a reliable indicator of the clonogenic content of blood mobilized with different chemotherapy regimens; (iii) because of the substantial impact that chemotherapy regimens have on the quantity and quality of collected CD34+ cells, anticancer effects and optimal blood progenitor cell yields should be evaluated for each chemotherapy schedule.

32 keywords...

hide…