• Eur. J. Pediatr. · Feb 2020

    Meta Analysis

    Twenty years of quantitative instrumental measures of swallowing in children: a systematic review.

    • Isuru Dharmarathna, Anna Miles, and Jacqui Allen.
    • Speech Science, School of Psychology, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. pdha800@aucklanduni.ac.nz.
    • Eur. J. Pediatr. 2020 Feb 1; 179 (2): 203-223.

    AbstractEarly identification and intervention has shown better health outcomes for children with dysphagia. Instrumental swallowing assessments are vital and have been a focus of dysphagia research in the last two decades. This systematic review explores published quantitative instrumental measures of swallowing in children. Five subject-related databases were searched to identify original scientific articles published in English, using instrumental quantitative measures of swallowing to study swallowing/feeding mechanism in children since 1998. Two thousand two hundred and two articles were found from the initial database search and 36 were included in the final qualitative synthesis following PRISMA guidelines. Selected studies showed great diversity in target population, phase/s of swallowing studied, instrumentation used (n = 10) and quantitative measures reported (n = 144). Videofluoroscopy and manometry have been studied most repeatedly. With less frequency, a variety of other instruments has been used to describe suck-swallow patterns and swallowing-related respiration. High-resolution manometry shows the greatest increase in publications with validated, reliable quantitative measures of pharyngeal and oesophageal pressures and timing. More recently, quantification of videofluoroscopy analysis has been a focus.Conclusion: A diverse range of quantitative measures of swallowing is available for children in the literature. However, further reliability and validity testing is needed. Opportunities for clinical application of these quantitative manometric and videofluoroscopic measures are restricted by limited normative comparisons and vast variability in published measures.What is known?• Instrumental swallowing assessments are reliable and accurate in diagnosing swallowing difficulties in children.• However, subjective interpretation of observational findings often questions the optimal use of instrumentation.What is new?• High-resolution manometry has shown promising progress with the development of quantitative objective swallow measures for children. While attempts to quantify video-fluoroscopic measures have been increased in the recent past.• A vast variety of instruments has been used to obtain quantitative and/or objective swallow measures of children, yet clinical application is still in progress.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…