• Iwona Pietraszek-Grzywaczewska, Szymon Bernas, Piotr Łojko, Anna Piechota, and Mariusz Piechota.
• Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy - Centre for Artificial Extracorporeal Kidney and Liver Support, The Dr Wł. Biegański Regional Specialist Hospital, Łódź, Poland. mariuszpiechota@poczta.onet.pl.
• Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2016 Jan 1; 48 (3): 175-9.

BackgroundScoring systems in critical care patients are essential for predicting of the patient outcome and evaluating the therapy. In this study, we determined the value of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scoring systems in the prediction of mortality in adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with severe purulent bacterial meningitis.MethodsWe retrospectively analysed data from 98 adult patients with severe purulent bacterial meningitis who were admitted to the single ICU between March 2006 and September 2015.ResultsUnivariate logistic regression identified the following risk factors of death in patients with severe purulent bacterial meningitis: APACHE II, SAPS II, SOFA, and GCS scores, and the lengths of ICU stay and hospital stay. The independent risk factors of patient death in multivariate analysis were the SAPS II score, the length of ICU stay and the length of hospital stay. In the prediction of mortality according to the area under the curve, the SAPS II score had the highest accuracy followed by the APACHE II, GCS and SOFA scores.ConclusionsFor the prediction of mortality in a patient with severe purulent bacterial meningitis, SAPS II had the highest accuracy.

30 keywords...

hide…