-
Aktuelle Traumatologie · Aug 1994
Comparative Study[2- to 7-year results of cement-free and cemented joint replacement in femoral neck fractures and coxarthrosis].
- M Runkel, K Wenda, U Jaeger, L Rudig, and W Röder.
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
- Aktuelle Traumatol. 1994 Aug 1; 24 (5): 173-9.
AbstractIn 43 patients with cementless and 43 patients with cemented hip prosthesis (S+G hip system) a clinical and radiological follow up was performed 2-7 years after total hip replacement. In average the follow up period was 43 or 48 months. We found good or excellent results in 88% after cementless and 95% after cemented fixation. The results after cementless hip replacement were caused by loosening in the early postoperative period in 3 cases and more frequently thigh pain. In conclusion of our results and the expected later results after 10 years follow up we prefer the cementless fixation in patients under 60 years and cemented fixation in the group over 70 years. Patients between 60 and 70 years seems to benefit from a fixation with an cementless acetabular component and an cemented stem (hybrid prosthesis).
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.