• Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 2007

    Clinical Trial

    The accuracy of the oxygen washout technique for functional residual capacity assessment during spontaneous breathing.

    • Hermann Heinze, Bernhard Schaaf, Jochen Grefer, Karl Klotz, and Wolfgang Eichler.
    • Department of Anesthesiology, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany. Hermannheinze@ngi.de
    • Anesth. Analg. 2007 Mar 1;104(3):598-604.

    BackgroundMeasurement of functional residual capacity (FRC) is of considerable interest for monitoring patients with lung injury. The lack of instruments has impeded routine bedside FRC measurement. Recently, a simple automated method for FRC assessment by O2 washout has been introduced. We designed this study to evaluate the accuracy of FRC measurement using the O2 washout technique.MethodsThe LUFU system (Draeger, Luebeck, Germany) estimates FRC by O2 washout, a variant of multiple breath nitrogen washout. This technique uses a sidestream O2-analyzer to calculate FRC from end-inspired and end-expired O2 concentrations during fast changes of Fio2. We measured FRC in 23 healthy, spontaneously breathing volunteers in the sitting position using three techniques: 1) helium dilution (FRC-He), 2) body plethysmography (FRC-bp), 3) oxygen washout (FRC-O2).ResultsFRC-O2 (mean 4.1 +/- 1.1 L, range 2.4-6.9 L) corresponds with FRC-He (mean 4.0 +/- 1.0 L, range 2.4-6.2 L; bias of FRC-O2: -0.2 +/- 0.4 L) and FRC-bp (mean 4.2 +/- 1.0 L, range 2.8-6.1 L; bias of FRC-O2: 0.1 +/- 0.6 L).ConclusionsThe bias and precision of the O2 washout technique using the LUFU system were clinically acceptable when compared with FRC-He and FRC-bp for FRC assessment in spontaneously breathing volunteers.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.