• Ann Nucl Med · Apr 2010

    The reproducibility of deep-inspiration breath-hold (18)F-FDG PET/CT technique in diagnosing various cancers affected by respiratory motion.

    • Shigeki Nagamachi, Hideyuki Wakamatsu, Shogo Kiyohara, Seigo Fujita, Shigemi Futami, Hideo Arita, Shozo Tamura, and Keiichi Kawai.
    • Department of Radiology, Miyazaki University, Kiyotake, Japan. snagama@med.miyazaki-u.ac.jp
    • Ann Nucl Med. 2010 Apr 1; 24 (3): 171-8.

    BackgroundThe deep-inspiration breath-hold PET/CT (DIBH PET/CT) technique improves the limitations of diagnosing a lesion located in an area influenced by respiratory motion that results in spatial misregistrations caused by respiration between PET and CT. However, its reproducibility with regard to calculating the maximal standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) and metabolic volume (MV) in DIBH PET/CT has not been elucidated.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to investigate the reproducibility of the DIBH PET/CT technique including calculating the SUV(max) and the MV.MethodsSixty patients with various cancers were enrolled. The subjects had 47 abdominal lesions and 28 chest lesions. All patients demonstrated a misregistered image in the early whole-body image taken 50 min after FDG intravenous infusions. We added the delayed spot images 40 min after the first image. On the delayed image, we performed both conventional techniques with non-breath-hold (NBH) and the DIBH technique. In the four times DIBH technique, we obtained the coefficient of variance (CV) in calculating these indices for evaluating reproducibility.ResultsThe SUV(max) value with DIBH showed an increase of 16.1-60.1% compared with that measured by NBH. The mean value of CV was 5.5 in thoracic lesions and 6.3 in abdominal lesions. The values of MV with DIBH showed a decrease of 14.0-20.1% compared with those measured by NBH. Regarding reproducibility, mean value of CV was 7.1 in thoracic lesions and 11.9 in abdominal lesions.ConclusionThe DIBH technique improves the inaccurate quantification of both SUV(max) and MV. Although the CV value of SUV(max) with DIBH technique is better in thoracic lesions compared with that in abdominal lesions, the reproducibility was acceptable.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.