• Arthroscopy · Apr 2008

    Comparative Study

    A biomechanical comparison of two suture anchor configurations for the repair of type II SLAP lesions subjected to a peel-back mechanism of failure.

    • Robert J Morgan, Marshall A Kuremsky, Richard D Peindl, and James E Fleischli.
    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina 28203, USA. morganrj07@yahoo.com
    • Arthroscopy. 2008 Apr 1; 24 (4): 383-8.

    PurposeThe purpose of this study was to biomechanically compare 2 different suture anchor configurations in the repair of type II SLAP lesions.MethodsStandardized type II SLAP lesions were created in 8 matched pairs of cadaveric shoulders. Two different suture anchor configurations were used to repair the type II SLAP lesions. Group 1 SLAP lesions were repaired with 1 suture anchor placed at the anterior border and a second suture anchor placed at the posterior border of the biceps tendon. Group 2 SLAP lesions were repaired with 2 suture anchors placed posterior to the biceps tendon. Biomechanical testing was conducted in 1 direction. A posterior-directed force, in the plane of the glenoid, simulated the peel-back mechanism that occurs during the late cocking phase of throwing. Biceps-labral complex displacement from the glenoid was measured with 2 miniature displacement transducers. Repair failure (2 mm of posterior labral displacement), ultimate failure, and construct stiffness were measured for each specimen.ResultsThe mean load to repair failure was 43.66 N in group 1 and 40.70 N in group 2. The mean load to ultimate failure was 156.28 N in group 1 and 162.06 N in group 2. The mean construct stiffness was 25.91 N/mm in group 1 and 30.28 N/mm in group 2. The differences between the 2 groups were not statistically significant in terms of repair failure, ultimate failure, and construct stiffness.ConclusionsWhen repaired type II SLAP lesions were subjected to a posterior vector load to simulate the peel-back mechanism, the 2 suture anchor configurations were biomechanically equivalent.Clinical RelevancePlacement of an anterior suture anchor could, theoretically, tension the anterior capsulolabral structures via the superior and middle glenohumeral ligaments to the superior labrum. The results of this study suggest that there is no biomechanical advantage to placing an anterior suture anchor and so the use of 2 posterior suture anchors may be preferable in the repair of type II SLAP lesions.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…