-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
A randomised trial of accelerated radiotherapy for localised invasive bladder cancer.
- Alan Horwich, David Dearnaley, Robert Huddart, John Graham, Eric Bessell, Malcolm Mason, and Judith Bliss.
- Academic Unit of Radiotherapy and Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Trust, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK. alan.horwich@icr.ac.uk
- Radiother Oncol. 2005 Apr 1; 75 (1): 34-43.
Background And PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of an accelerated fractionation regimen to treat localised muscle invasive bladder cancer.Patients And MethodsA prospective randomised trial was undertaken in 229 patients randomised between 1988 and 1998 comparing accelerated fractionation (AF) to a dose of 60.8 Gy in 32 fractions over 26 days with conventional fractionation (CF) treating to 64 Gy in 32 fractions over 45 days. Accelerated fractionation was delivered using two fractions per day with a 6h gap between fractions and with the first daily fraction size being 1.8 Gy and the second daily fraction size being 2.0 Gy. There was a 1 week treatment gap after the first 12 fractions. Conventional fractionation was one fraction per day, 5 days per week. Eligible patients had clinical stage T2 or T3, N0 or N1, M0 transitional cell carcinoma. The primary endpoint of the trial was local control and the trial was powered to detect a 20% difference (alpha 0.05, power 90%). Secondary endpoints were toxicity and survival.ResultsIn the initial phase of the trial, randomisation was unequal such that in total 129 patients were randomised to accelerated fractionation and 100 to conventional fractionation. Acute toxicity was evaluable in 121 patients treated with AF and 96 patients treated with CF. RTOG grade 2 or 3 bowel toxicity was noted in 44% of AF patients compared to 26% of CF patients (P trend =0.001). Acute grade 2 or 3 bladder toxicity was seen in 35% of AF patients compared to 36% of CF patients (P=0.99). Late radiation toxicity was evaluated in patients surviving free from local recurrence at 2 years post treatment. Late radiation toxicity equivalent to RTOG grade 2 or more had occurred in 44% (95% CI 34-55%) of AF patients and in 38% (95% CI 26-49%) of CF patients (logrank over 5 years follow-up P=0.23). There was no significant difference in analysis of time to loss of local tumour control comparing the two treatment arms; local recurrence was recorded in 29 of the 100 patients treated with CF and in 41 of 129 patients treated with AF (logrank P=0.86). There was also no significant difference between the treatment arms comparing disease-free survival and overall survival. The overall survival figures at 3 years were for AF 54% (95% CI 45-63%) and for CF 47% (95% CI 36-57%). By 5 years the overall survival was 37% for AF and 40% for CF. There were two treatment related deaths, both on the AF arm of the trial.ConclusionsThis accelerated fractionation schedule did not improve on the efficacy of conventional fractionation for patients with T2 and T3 bladder cancer and accelerated fractionation was associated with increased acute bowel reactions.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.