• Arthroscopy · May 2015

    Topographic analysis of the capitellum and distal femoral condyle: finding the best match for treating osteochondral defects of the humeral capitellum.

    • Jason J Shin, Marc Haro, Adam B Yanke, Randy Mascarenhas, Anthony A Romeo, Brian J Cole, Nozomu Inoue, and Nikhil N Verma.
    • Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.. Electronic address: jasonjwshin@gmail.com.
    • Arthroscopy. 2015 May 1; 31 (5): 843-9.

    PurposeThe purpose of this study was to determine the donor zone of most congruent topographic match by comparing 4 donor sites from the femur with 4 potential recipient sites of osteochondritis dissecans at the capitellum.MethodsComputed tomography was performed on 5 right elbows and 6 right medial and 6 right lateral distal femoral hemicondyles, which included the femoral notch. Three-dimensional computed tomography models were created and exported into point-cloud models. A local coordinate map of the distal humerus and distal femoral articular surfaces was created. The capitellum was compared with the medial and lateral distal femoral condyles, with 2 donor zones in each condyle (medial trochlea and medial intercondylar notch or lateral trochlea and lateral intercondylar notch). In each capitellum 4 combinations of 10-mm defects were simulated (central and lateral, 30° and 45° anterior to shaft of humerus), resulting in 480 capitellum-femur comparative combinations being tested. The capitellum surfaces were virtually placed on a point on the femoral articular surface in 3-dimensional space. The least distances (i.e., the shortest distance from the point in question to the corresponding point in space) between the point clouds on the distal humerus and distal femoral articular surfaces were calculated.ResultsThere was a less than 0.1-mm difference in the topographic articular surface match among the 4 commonly used donor sites of the distal femur and 4 recipient sites of the capitellum. However, the best match for any given 10-mm capitellar defect (central 30°, central 45°, lateral 30°, and lateral 45°) was the same such that the lateral trochlea on the femur always yielded the best fit compared with the 3 other graft locations (P < .005).ConclusionsOur results indicate that there is a less than 0.1-mm difference in the topographic articular surface match among the 4 commonly used donor sites of the distal femur and the capitellum. The findings suggest that all 4 donor sites provide close articular matching for the capitellum articular surface, with the lateral trochlea articular surface providing the best match.Clinical RelevanceThese data suggest that a single donor plug may be obtained from multiple sites in the knee and placed into capitellar lesions with an excellent topographic articular surface match. The findings of our study will be useful to surgeons when managing capitellar osteochondritis dissecans lesions.Copyright © 2015 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…