• J Schmidt, J Fechner, B Fritsch, B Schmitz, R Carbon, W Rösch, and S Albrecht.
• Klinik für Anästhesiologie der Friedrich-Alexander-Univrsität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Krankenhausstrasse 12, 91054 Erlangen. joachim.schmidt@stud.uni-erlangen.de
• Anaesthesist. 2001 Oct 1; 50 (10): 757-66.

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to compare total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) using propofol and remifentanil (P/R-group) and balanced anaesthesia (BA) using sevoflurane and remifentanil (S/R-group) for paediatric surgery.Patients And MethodsA total of 120 patients aged 6 months to 16 years scheduled for elective minor lower abdominal surgery were randomly assigned to receive either propofol (5-10 mg/kg/h) and remifentanil (0.125-1.0 microgram/kg/min) or sevoflurane (1.0-1.5 MAC) and remifentanil (0.125-1.0 microgram/kg/min). Perioperative haemodynamics as well as recovery and discharge times, PONV and side-effects were studied. The patients vigilance, comfort and pain intensity were assessed postoperatively using the objective pain discomfort scale, the Steward post-anaesthetic recovery score and a visual analogue scale.ResultsPostoperative recovery (9.0 vs 11.6 min) and extubation times (11.8 vs. 15.0 min) as well as the time taken until a Steward post-anaesthetic recovery score > 3/4 (15.2 vs. 21.4 min) was reached were significantly shorter in the P/R-group. However, the length of time until discharge to the ward, postoperative comfort, pain intensity and analgesic requirements as well as PONV were comparable in both groups.ConclusionsWith regards to the investigated parameters, TIVA with propofol and remifentanil is equally effective as BA with sevoflurane and remifentanil in paediatric patients. However, considering the selected dosing regimen, recovery times were significantly shorter for children after TIVA.

37 keywords...

hide…