• Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. · Jan 1996

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    The management of pneumothorax with the thoracic vent versus conventional intercostal tube drainage.

    • M Röggla, A Wagner, C Brunner, and G Röggla.
    • Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Vienna.
    • Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 1996 Jan 1; 108 (11): 330-3.

    AbstractThe thoracic vent is a new minimally invasive device for the treatment of spontaneous and iatrogenic pneumothorax. It consists of a polyurethane catheter connected to a plastic chamber containing a one-way valve. As there is no need to connect the thoracic vent to an underwater seal device, immobilization and hospitalization can be avoided. So far the performance of the thoracic vent has been evaluated only in patients without pleural effusions and without signs of tension pneumothorax. Hence, we have performed a randomized study comparing the treatment of pneumothorax by means of the thoracic vent versus conventional intercostal tube drainage in 30 patients, including some with tension pneumothorax. 17 patients were treated with the thoracic vent, 13 with conventional intercostal tube drainage. We found no significant differences in the rate of reexpansion and rate of complications between the group treated with the thoracic vent and the group treated with intercostal tube drainage, but the patients treated with the thoracic vent needed significantly less analgesics. 70% of the patients treated with the thoracic vent were successfully managed on an outpatient basis. All patients treated with intercostal tube drainage were hospitalised; duration of inpatient-therapy was 8 +/- 6.2 days (mean +/- SD).

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.