• Eur J Clin Nutr · Jun 1994

    Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial

    Assessment of a modified household food weighing method in a study of bone health in China.

    • J F Hu, X H Zhao, B Parpia, J S Chen, and T C Campbell.
    • Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
    • Eur J Clin Nutr. 1994 Jun 1; 48 (6): 442-52.

    ObjectiveA 'modified' household dietary method to estimate individual intakes from total household intakes was evaluated in comparison to the individual food weighing method, i.e. direct weighing of foods consumed by individuals.DesignFoods consumed by the household were weighed and recorded over a 3 day period and were proportionally allocated to a specific person in the household by using energy conversion factors based on age, gender and physical activity. The individual dietary intakes were standardized by body weight (ratio of individual body weight to reference body weight from Chinese Recommended Daily Allowances (Acta Nutr. Sin. 12, 1-9), and were compared with the estimates from the individual food weighing method for both accuracy and associations with bone density.SettingThe subjects were randomly selected from five rural countries in China, characterized by different dietary patterns.SubjectsA total of 712 women aged 35-75 years participated in the dietary and bone measurements.ResultsNutrient intakes estimated by the modified household method (adjusting for body weight were very similar to those obtained by the individual method (r = 0.53-0.78, P < 0.001), except for sodium which had the largest deviation from the individual methods (r = 0.23, P < 0.001). Calcium intakes were 405 +/- 271 and 409 +/- 323 mg/day, respectively, as estimated by the individual and modified household methods. A very similar degree of correlation with radial bone density also was obtained for both calcium estimates.ConclusionThe results indicate that the modified household method is appropriate for assessing food intakes of individuals in large nutritional studies.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…