• Stephen L Barnes, Bryce R H Robinson, J Taliesin Richards, Cindy E Zimmerman, Tim A Pritts, Betty J Tsuei, Karyn L Butler, Peter C Muskat, Kenneth Davis, and Jay A Johannigman.
• Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. barnesste@missouri.edu
• Surgery. 2008 Oct 1; 144 (4): 670-5; discussion 675-6.

BackgroundFalling reimbursement rates for trauma care demand a concerted effort of charge capture for the fiscal survival of trauma surgeons. We compared current procedure terminology code distribution and billing patterns for Subsequent Hospital Care (SHC) before and after the institution of standardized documentation.MethodsStandardized SHC progress notes were created. The note was formulated with an emphasis on efficiency and accuracy. Documentation was completed by residents in conjunction with attendings following standard guidelines of linkage. Year-to-year patient volume, length of stay (LOS), injury severity, bills submitted, coding of service, work relative value units (wRVUs), revenue stream, and collection rate were compared with and without standardized documentation.ResultsA 394% average revenue increase was observed with the standardization of SHC documentation. Submitted charges more than doubled in the first year despite a 14% reduction in admissions and no change in length of stay. Significant increases in level II and level III billing and billing volume (P < .05) were sustainable year to year and resulted in an average per patient admission SHC income increase from $91.85 to $362.31.ConclusionsUse of a standardized daily progress note dramatically increases the accuracy of coding and associated billing of subsequent hospital care for trauma services.

33 keywords...

hide…