• Experimental hematology · Jan 2003

    Comparative Study

    Long-term marrow reconstitutive ability of autologous grafts in lymphoma patients using peripheral blood mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor compared to bone marrow.

    • Lotfi Benboubker, Guillaume Cartron, Françoise Roingeard, Martine Delain, Michel Degenne, Claude Linassier, Olivier Hérault, Danielle Truglio, Myrtille Bout, André Petit, Jean Louis Brémond, Isabelle Desbois, Philippe Colombat, Christian Binet, and Jorge Domenech.
    • Laboratory of Hematology, UPRES-EA 3249, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France.
    • Exp. Hematol. 2003 Jan 1; 31 (1): 89-97.

    ObjectivesThe aim of this study was designed to compare the in vivo long-term hematopoietic potential of bone marrow and peripheral blood grafts.Materials And MethodsMarrow progenitor cell recovery was assessed for up to 4 years in 227 patients. One hundred patients were treated for malignant lymphomas by autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT) and 127 by peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT).ResultsMarrow progenitor cell counts were decreased for several years with both bone marrow and peripheral blood grafts. They were not different according to the origin of the graft, despite the reduced duration of peripheral blood cell recovery observed after PBPCT. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) used for PB graft mobilization and after transplantation resulted in faster neutrophil recovery compared to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) with no evidence of decreased marrow progenitor cell recoveries. On the other hand, postgraft administration of GM-CSF enhanced long-term colony-forming unit granulocyte-macrophage reconstitution only after BMT. Factors that influenced marrow progenitor cell reconstitution have been identified by univariate and multivariate analysis: age, gender, type of lymphoma, and postgraft administration of hematopoietic growth factors (HGF) for the whole patient group; gender, graft progenitor cell yields, and type of HGF (G-CSF vs GM-CSF) for the PBPCT group; and only type of HGF for the BMT group. Despite faster peripheral blood cell recovery, persistent deficiency of marrow progenitor cells was found several years after PBPCT, as observed after BMT. G-CSF-mobilized PBPCT resulted in faster neutrophil recovery compared to GM-CSF mobilization, with no difference in long-term hematopoietic reconstitution.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.