• Health Care Manage Rev · Jan 2017

    Team dynamics, clinical work satisfaction, and patient care coordination between primary care providers: A mixed methods study.

    • Hummy Song, Molly Ryan, Shalini Tendulkar, Josephine Fisher, Julia Martin, Antoinette S Peters, Joseph P Frolkis, Meredith B Rosenthal, Alyna T Chien, and Sara J Singer.
    • Hummy Song, MPP, is PhD Candidate, PhD Program in Health Policy, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts. E-mail: hsong@hbs.edu. Molly Ryan, MPH, is Research Associate, Institute for Community Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts.1 Shalini Tendulkar, ScD, ScM, is Research and Evaluation Scientist, Institute for Community Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Josephine Fisher, BA, is Research Assistant, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.1 Julia Martin, BA, is Research Study Assistant, General Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Massachusetts.1 Antoinette S. Peters, PhD, is Associate Professor, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Joseph P. Frolkis, MD, PhD, is Vice Chair for Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Meredith B. Rosenthal, PhD, is Professor, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. Alyna T. Chien, MD, MS, is Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, Division of General Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Massachusetts. Sara J. Singer, MBA, PhD, is Associate Professor, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
    • Health Care Manage Rev. 2017 Jan 1; 42 (1): 28-41.

    BackgroundTeam-based care is essential for delivering high-quality, comprehensive, and coordinated care. Despite considerable research about the effects of team-based care on patient outcomes, few studies have examined how team dynamics relate to provider outcomes.PurposeThe aim of this study was to examine relationships among team dynamics, primary care provider (PCP) clinical work satisfaction, and patient care coordination between PCPs in 18 Harvard-affiliated primary care practices participating in Harvard's Academic Innovations Collaborative.MethodologyFirst, we administered a cross-sectional survey to all 548 PCPs (267 attending clinicians, 281 resident physicians) working at participating practices; 65% responded. We assessed the relationship of team dynamics with PCPs' clinical work satisfaction and perception of patient care coordination between PCPs, respectively, and the potential mediating effect of patient care coordination on the relationship between team dynamics and work satisfaction. In addition, we embedded a qualitative evaluation within the quantitative evaluation to achieve a convergent mixed methods design to help us better understand our findings and illuminate relationships among key variables.FindingsBetter team dynamics were positively associated with clinical work satisfaction and quality of patient care coordination between PCPs. Coordination partially mediated the relationship between team dynamics and satisfaction for attending clinicians, suggesting that higher satisfaction depends, in part, on better teamwork, yielding more coordinated patient care. We found no mediating effects for resident physicians. Qualitative results suggest that sources of satisfaction from positive team dynamics for PCPs may be most relevant to attending clinicians.Practice ImplicationsImproving primary care team dynamics could improve clinical work satisfaction among PCPs and patient care coordination between PCPs. In addition to improving outcomes that directly concern health care providers, efforts to improve aspects of team dynamics may also help resolve critical challenges in workforce planning in primary care.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…