• Ryan J Courtney, Hayden McRobbie, Piotr Tutka, Natasha A Weaver, Dennis Petrie, Colin P Mendelsohn, Anthony Shakeshaft, Saki Talukder, Christel Macdonald, Dennis Thomas, Benjamin C H Kwan, Natalie Walker, Coral Gartner, Richard P Mattick, Christine Paul, Stuart G Ferguson, Nicholas A Zwar, Robyn L Richmond, Christopher M Doran, Veronica C Boland, Wayne Hall, Robert West, and Michael Farrell.
• National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
• JAMA. 2021 Jul 6; 326 (1): 56-64.

ImportanceCytisine is more effective than placebo and nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation. However, cytisine has not been tested against the most effective smoking cessation medication, varenicline, which is associated with adverse events known to lead to discontinuation of therapy.ObjectiveTo examine whether standard cytisine treatment (25 days) was at least as effective as standard varenicline treatment (84 days) for smoking cessation.Design, Setting, And ParticipantsThis noninferiority, open-label randomized clinical trial with allocation concealment and blinded outcome assessment was undertaken in Australia from November 2017 through May 2019; follow-up was completed in January 2020. A total of 1452 Australian adult daily smokers willing to make a quit attempt were included. Data collection was conducted primarily by computer-assisted telephone interview, but there was an in-person visit to validate the primary outcome.InterventionsTreatments were provided in accordance with the manufacturers' recommended dosage: cytisine (n = 725), 1.5-mg capsules taken 6 times daily initially then gradually reduced over the 25-day course; varenicline (n = 727), 0.5-mg tablets titrated to 1 mg twice daily for 84 days (12 weeks). All participants were offered referral to standard telephone behavioral support.Main Outcomes And MeasuresThe primary outcome was 6-month continuous abstinence verified using a carbon monoxide breath test at 7-month follow-up. The noninferiority margin was set at 5% and the 1-sided significance threshold was set at .025.ResultsAmong 1452 participants who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 42.9 [12.7] years; 742 [51.1%] women), 1108 (76.3%) completed the trial. Verified 6-month continuous abstinence rates were 11.7% for the cytisine group and 13.3% for the varenicline group (risk difference, -1.62% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -5.02% to ∞]; P = .03 for noninferiority). Self-reported adverse events occurred less frequently in the cytisine group (997 events among 482 participants) compared with the varenicline group (1206 events among 510 participants) and the incident rate ratio was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.81 to 0.95; P = .002).Conclusions And RelevanceAmong daily smokers willing to quit, cytisine treatment for 25 days, compared with varenicline treatment for 84 days, failed to demonstrate noninferiority regarding smoking cessation.Trial Registrationanzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12616001654448.

26 keywords...

hide…