• J Neurosurg Sci · Jun 2019

    Long-term survival after glioblastoma resection: hope despite poor prognosis factors.

    • Emmanuel Costa, Tévi M Lawson, Julie Lelotte, Edward Fomekong, R Geraldo Vaz, Laurette Renard, Nicolas Whenham, and Christian Raftopoulos.
    • Department of Neurosurgery, Saint-Luc Hospital, Chatolic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
    • J Neurosurg Sci. 2019 Jun 1; 63 (3): 251-257.

    BackgroundIn spite of aggressive multimodal treatment, survival for patients with glioblastoma (GBM) remains short. Nevertheless, some patients survive much longer than expected and become long-term survival patients. The extent of resection (EoR), Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), age and methyl-guanine methyltransferase gene (MGMT) methylation are well-defined prognostic factors, but the characteristics of patients with long-term survival (LTS, survival of at least three years after diagnosis) has not been fully determined yet. That is the reason why we analyzed the GBM patients with LTS at our center.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients who underwent surgery for GBM between January 2002 and November 2011, including patients treated with surgical resection under neuronavigation with or without intraoperative MRI (ioMRI) and those who had stereotactic biopsy. We identified and further analyzed those patients with LTS.ResultsA total of 127 patients underwent surgery for GBM during the study period. 101 (79.6%) of whom had surgical resection and 26 (20.4%) of whom had stereotactic biopsy. Of the 101 patients who were treated with surgical resection, 12 had LTS. After two other pathologists reviewed the patients' cases, they confirmed that 11 (11%) of the 12 patients had a GBM (female/male ratio 4.5; average age 50 years; preoperative Karnofsky Score 82%), and one patient had an anaplastic glioma. The mean survival in the LTS patients with confirmed GBM was 74 (36-150) months. Seven of the LTS patients (63.6%) had a gross total resection (GTR), including two with an additional resection after ioMRI. Three (27.3%) had a near total resection (NTR: residue ≤5%) and one (9.1%) had a partial resection. Ten (90.9%) patients had a methylation of MGMT, only two (18.8%) had an IDH1 mutation, and seven (63.6%) received a full Stupp protocol.ConclusionsAmong patients with a GBM who were treated with one or more resections, 11% had LTS with 90.9% with at least a near total resection (36% with ioMRI) and a methylated MGMT. 50% of the patients with a second surgery survived at least two years postoperatively. Those encouraging observations emphasize the importance of maximizing the resection by using, if possible, an intraoperative guidance method like ioMRI with an analysis of biomarkers such as MGMT and if necessary, multiple surgical procedures.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…