• World J. Gastroenterol. · Jun 2014

    Prognostic factors in patients with middle and distal bile duct cancers.

    • Hyung Jun Kwon, Sang Geol Kim, Jae Min Chun, Won Kee Lee, and Yoon Jin Hwang.
    • Hyung Jun Kwon, Sang Geol Kim, Yoon Jin Hwang, Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu 702-210, South Korea.
    • World J. Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 7; 20 (21): 6658-65.

    AimTo identify the influence of the surgery type and prognostic factors in middle and distal bile duct cancers.MethodsBetween August 1990 and June 2011, data regarding the clinicopathological factors of 194 patients with surgical and pathological confirmation were collected. A total of 133 patients underwent resections (R0, R1, R2; n = 102, 24, 7), whereas 61 patients underwent nonresectional surgery. Either pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or bile duct resection (BDR) was selected according to the sites of tumors and co-morbidities of the patients after confirming resection margin by the frozen histology in all cases. Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinicopathologic factors were performed, utilizing the Kaplan-Meyer method and Cox hazard regression analysis.ResultsThe overall 5-year survival rate for the 133 patients who underwent resection (R0, R1, and R2) was 41.2%, whereas no patients survived longer than 3 years among the 61 patient who underwent nonresectional surgeries. The 5-year survival rate of the patients who underwent a PD (n = 90) was higher than the rate of those who underwent BDR (n = 43), although the difference was not statistically significant (46.6% vs 30.0% P = 0.105). However, PD had a higher rate of R0 resection than BDR (90.0% vs 48.8%, P < 0.0001). If R0 resection was achieved, PD and BDR showed similar survival rates (49.4% vs 46.5% P = 0.762). The 5-year survival rates of R0 and R1 resections were not significantly different (49.0% vs 21.0% P = 0.132), but R2 resections had lower survival (0%, P = 0.0001). Although positive lymph node, presence of perineural invasion, presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI), 7th AJCC-UICC tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage, and involvement of resection margin were significant prognostic factors in univariate analysis, multivariate analysis identified only TNM stage and LVI as independent prognostic factors.ConclusionPD had a greater likelihood of curative resection and R1 resection might have some positive impact. The TNM stage and LVI were independent prognostic factors.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…