• Anesthesiology · Nov 1991

    Comparative Study

    An evaluation of anesthesiologists' present checkout methods and the validity of the FDA checklist.

    • M G March and J J Crowley.
    • Department of Anesthesiology, George Washington University Hospital, Washington, D.C. 20037.
    • Anesthesiology. 1991 Nov 1;75(5):724-9.

    AbstractThe United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published the Anesthesia Apparatus Checkout Recommendations (checklist) in order to improve the methods anesthesiologists use to check out anesthesia equipment. Whereas no published study of current checkout methods had been performed since the introduction of the FDA checklist, we compared anesthesiologists' current anesthesia equipment pre-use checkout methods with anesthesiologists' use of the FDA checklist. One hundred and eighty-eight anesthesiologists were tested to compare the number of prearranged anesthesia machine faults that could be detected with 1) their own checkout methods and 2) the FDA checklist. The average number of machine faults detected with the individual anesthesiologists' checkout methods was 1.03/4 (25.8%) and with the FDA checklist was 1.20/4 (29.9%). For only one fault, malfunction of the oxygen/nitrous oxide ratio protection system, was there a statistically significant improvement (P less than 0.01) with the use of the FDA checklist. Anesthesiologists in residency training detected more faults (average 2.46/8, 30.8%) than did anesthesiologists who primarily practiced direct patient care (1.98/8, 23.9%) (P less than 0.01). Our data indicate that the mere introduction of the FDA checklist did not improve the ability of anesthesiologists to detect anesthesia machine faults.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.