• Georgios Tsivgoulis, Aristeidis H Katsanos, Dimitris Mavridis, Zuzana Gdovinova, Michał Karliński, Mary Joan Macleod, Daniel Strbian, and Niaz Ahmed.
• Second Department of Neurology, Attikon University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
• Ann. Neurol. 2018 Jul 1; 84 (1): 89-97.

ObjectiveWe assessed the outcomes of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients on dual antiplatelet therapy prior to stroke onset.MethodsWe analyzed prospectively collected data from the Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke (SITS) International Stroke Thrombolysis Register on consecutive IVT-treated AIS patients during a 7-year period (2010-2017). In propensity score matched groups of patients with dual antiplatelet pretreatment and no antiplatelet pretreatment, we compared: (1) symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH), according to SITS Monitoring Study (MOST), European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) II, and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) definitions; (2) 3-month mortality; (3) 3-month favorable functional outcome (FFO; modified Rankin Scale [mRS] scores = 0-1); (4) 3-month functional independence (FI; mRS scores = 0-2); and (5) distribution of the 3-month mRS scores. Dual antiplatelet pretreatment was defined as all possible combinations among aspirin, clopidogrel, dipyridamole, and any other antiplatelet.ResultsPropensity score matching resulted in 2 groups of 1,043 patients each, balanced for all baseline characteristics. In the propensity score matched analysis, the 2 groups had comparable (p > 0.017 using Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons) SICH rates according to SITS-MOST (2.9% vs 1.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.03 to -0.01), ECASS II (5.2% vs 4.4%, 95% CI = -0.03 to 0.01), and NINDS (7.7% vs 6.6%, 95% CI = -0.03 to 0.01) definitions. No differences in the 3-month mortality (17.9% vs 16.6%, 95% CI = -0.05 to 0.02), FFO (45.6% vs 46.0%, 95% CI = -0.04 to 0.05), FI (59.2% vs 60.7%, 95% CI = -0.03 to 0.06), or distribution in 3-month mRS scores (2 [1-4] vs 2 [0-4], 95% CI = -0.29 to 0.09) were documented between the 2 groups.InterpretationGiven that patients on dual antiplatelet pretreatment have similar SICH, 3-month mortality rates, and functional outcomes compared to patients with no antiplatelet pretreatment, dual antiplatelet pretreatment history should not be used as a reason to withhold IVT in otherwise eligible AIS patients. Ann Neurol 2018;83:89-97.© 2018 American Neurological Association.

18 keywords...

hide…