• Academic radiology · Apr 2017

    Measuring Interobserver Disagreement in Rating Diagnostic Characteristics of Pulmonary Nodule Using the Lung Imaging Database Consortium and Image Database Resource Initiative.

    • Hongli Lin, Changxing Huang, Weisheng Wang, Jiawei Luo, Xuedong Yang, and Yuling Liu.
    • College of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering and Collaboration and Innovation Center for Digital Chinese Medicine of 2011 Project of Colleges and Universities, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China. Electronic address: hllin@hnu.edu.cn.
    • Acad Radiol. 2017 Apr 1; 24 (4): 401-410.

    Rationale And ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to measure and analyze interobserver disagreement in rating diagnostic characteristics of pulmonary nodules on computed tomography scans using the Lung Imaging Database Consortium and Image Database Resource Initiative (LIDC/IDRI) database, and then to provide investigators with understanding the variability in rating diagnostic characteristics among radiologists.Materials And MethodsA histogram-based accumulated nodule-level approach is proposed to measure interobserver disagreement in rating diagnostic characteristics of pulmonary nodules among radiologists. The mean rating differences of radiologists on nodule level are calculated; next, a histogram of the accumulated nodule-level disagreements is constructed; and finally, mean, variance, skewness, and kurtosis statistics based on the histogram are extracted to analyze and summary interobserver disagreement in terms of the assessment of diagnostic characteristics of radiologists. Using the developed computer scheme, the disagreement of radiologists in rating all of 1880 distinct nodules from 1018 computed tomography scans are analyzed using original ratings as well as combined ratings according to the LIDC/IDRI instruction.ResultsThe interobserver disagreement in rating diagnostic characteristics according to the defined categories of the LIDC/IDRI is substantial. The mean values of disagreement range from 0.0052 to 0.2341. The highest disagreement lies in rating subtlety characteristics, whereas internal structure receives the lowest disagreement of 0.0052. The calcification, texture, spiculation, lobulation, malignancy, sphericity, and margin receive disagreements of 0.0393, 0.1351, 0.1616, 0.1943, 0.2144, 0.2174, and 0.2228, respectively.ConclusionsDisagreements exist across radiologists in rating diagnostic characteristics of pulmonary nodules, and the disagreement levels vary from each other. Agreement among radiologists is improved by combining ratings according to the LIDC/IDRI instruction. For investigators, understanding and appreciating the disagreement level of each diagnostic characteristic is required when using them in related researches.Copyright © 2017 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…