• Shalizeh A Patel, Juliana A Barros, Christina M Clark, Gary N Frey, Charles F Streckfus, and Ryan L Quock.
• Dr. Patel is Associate Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, The University of Texas School of Dentistry at Houston; Dr. Barros is Associate Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, The University of Texas School of Dentistry at Houston; Dr. Clark is Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, The University of Texas School of Dentistry at Houston; Dr. Frey is Associate Professor and Chair, Department of General Practice and Public Health, The University of Texas School of Dentistry at Houston; Dr. Streckfus is Professor, Department of Diagnostic and Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas School of Dentistry at Houston; and Dr. Quock is Associate Professor and Vice-Chair, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, The University of Texas School of Dentistry at Houston. Shalizeh.Patel@uth.tmc.edu.
• J Dent Educ. 2015 Sep 1; 79 (9): 1101-7.

AbstractThe aim of this study was to examine the impact of psychomotor operative video demonstrations on first-year dental students who are performing specific procedures for the first time in a preclinical setting. The class was randomly divided into two groups, and three restorative procedures were selected. On the date on which each procedure was to be performed in the preclinical laboratory for the first time, one group (experimental, n=50) was shown a technique video for that specific procedure immediately before commencing the exercise; the control cohort (n=50) did not view the video. Technical performance on procedures was evaluated by students and two calibrated and blinded examiners. The students' perceptions of the experience were also collected in a survey. All first-year students participated in the study, for a 100% response rate. A Mann-Whitney U test did not show any group differences in technical performance (mean values on preparation: 77.1 vs. 77.8; amalgam: 82.7 vs. 82.8; composite: 79.7 vs. 78.0). A Spearman rho test revealed a significantly higher correlation in 13 out of 25 evaluation categories between student self-assessment and blinded examiner assessment for the experimental group. A chi-square test of questionnaire responses revealed a positive student perception of administering these videos for the preparation (X(2)=4.8, p<0.03), the amalgam restoration (X(2)=12.4, p<0.001), and the composite restoration (X(2)=11.3, p<0.001). The psychomotor video demonstrations did not immediately improve student performance on preclinical operative procedures, but they were well received by students and augmented self-assessment ability. These findings suggest that videos can be a useful teaching aid in a preclinical environment, especially regarding comprehension of concepts.

35 keywords...

hide…