• Ann Peters, Noah B Rindos, Richard S Guido, and Nicole M Donnellan.
• Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
• J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Jan 1; 25 (1): 24-25.

Study ObjectiveTo demonstrate surgical techniques utilized during uterine-sparing laparoscopic resections of accessory cavitated uterine masses (ACUMs). ACUMs represent a rare uterine entity observed in premenopausal women suffering from dysmenorrhea and recurrent pelvic pain. The diagnosis is made when an isolated extra-cavitated uterine mass is resected from an otherwise normal appearing uterus with unremarkable endometrial lumen and adnexal structures. Pathologic confirmation requires an accessory cavity lined with endometrial epithelium (and corresponding glands and stroma) filled with chocolate-brown fluid. Adenomyosis must be absent. Although the origin of ACUMs is currently unknown, the most common presentation is a 2-4 cm lateral uterine wall mass at the level of the insertion of the round ligament. Hence it has been hypothesized that gubernaculum dysfunction may be responsible for duplication or persistence of paramesonephric tissue leading to ACUM formation as a new Müllerian anomaly.DesignA stepwise surgical tutorial describing 2 laparoscopic ACUM resections using a narrated video (Canadian Task Force classification III).SettingAn academic tertiary care hospital.PatientsIn this video, we present 2 patients who underwent uterine-sparing laparoscopic resections of their ACUM in order to preserve fertility (Case 1) or avoid the complications and surgical recovery time of a total laparoscopic hysterectomy (Case 2). Case 1 is a 19-year-old, gravida 0, para 0 woman with dysmenorrhea and recurrent pelvic pain who presented for multiple emergency room and outpatient evaluations. Transvaginal ultrasonography was unremarkable except for a 28×30×26mm left lateral uterine mass with peripheral vascular flow that was initially felt to be a leiomyoma or rudimentary uterine horn. MRI imaging, however, demonstrated this mass to be more consistent with an ACUM. This was based on the lack of communication between the lesion and the main uterine cavity exhibited by high T2 signal (compatible with endometrial tissue) surrounding low T2/high T1 signal in the dependent aspects (representing blood products). After counseling regarding treatment options including medical management with hormonal contraception, the patient elected for definitive fertility preserving laparoscopic resection. In contrast, case 2 is a 39-year-old, gravida 3, para 3 woman with a 2 month history or left lower quadrant pain following her last vaginal delivery. Transvaginal ultrasonography showed a 23×18×19mm cystic structure within the left uterine wall, which was confirmed to represent an ACUM on MRI. Although she had no desire for fertility preservation, the patient elected for surgical resection of the mass as opposed to a hysterectomy in order to minimize complications and recovery time.InterventionsLaparoscopic resection of ACUMs in patients desiring uterine preservation.Measurements And Main ResultsLaparoscopic resection of the ACUMs was performed utilizing 2 different techniques. In both cases, dilute vasopressin was injected with a modified butterfly or spinal needle along the uterine-ACUM serosal interphase to aid with hemostasis. In patients desiring to preserve fertility (case 1) monopolar energy is utilized to make an incision along the ACUM serosa to help facilitate dissection. ACUM enucleation is then commenced in a circumferential manner along the ACUM and uterine myometrial interphase utilizing bipolar energy. In contrast to leiomyomas where dissection advances along the pseudocapsule, ACUM have poorly delineated borders with disorganized muscular fibers making dissection particularly difficult. A variety of instruments can be utilized to help in the sequential circumferential dissection in addition to a bipolar device including a single-tooth tenaculum, myoma hook, suction device or fine-needle grasper. Ultimately, the ACUM is transected off its uterine-myometrial attachment and hemostasis is obtain before closing the uterine defect in at least 2 layers using a 2-0 barbed V-Loc (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN). If fertility preservation is no longer desired, the dissection can greatly be expedited by performing a salpingectomy and skeletonizing the ACUM from the leaves of the broad ligament (case 2). A monopolar L-hook can then be used to transect the ACUM from the remaining uterine body. While difficult, these cases can be completed laparoscopically in approximately 2 hours with minimal blood loss.ConclusionsACUMs are hypothesized to represent a previously under recognized Müllerian anomaly linked to gubernaculum dysfunction that occurs in premenopausal women with dysmenorrhea and chronic pelvic pain. Uterine and fertility sparing laparoscopic resection is possible but challenging due to poorly defined planes.Copyright © 2017 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

25 keywords...

hide…