-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Transplantation-free survival and interventions at 3 years in the single ventricle reconstruction trial.
- Jane W Newburger, Lynn A Sleeper, Peter C Frommelt, Gail D Pearson, William T Mahle, Shan Chen, Carolyn Dunbar-Masterson, Seema Mital, Ismee A Williams, Nancy S Ghanayem, Caren S Goldberg, Jeffrey P Jacobs, Catherine D Krawczeski, Alan B Lewis, Sara K Pasquali, Christian Pizarro, Peter J Gruber, Andrew M Atz, Svetlana Khaikin, J William Gaynor, Richard G Ohye, and Pediatric Heart Network Investigators.
- From the Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (J.W.N., C.D.-M.); New England Research Institutes, Watertown, MA (L.A.S., S.C.); Children's Hospital of Wisconsin and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (P.C.F.); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (G.D.P.); Emory University, Atlanta, GA (W.T.M.); Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada (S.M., S.K.); Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital of New York-Presbyterian, New York (I.A.W.); University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor (C.S.G., R.G.O.); The Congenital Heart Institute of Florida, St. Petersburg (J.P.J.); Cincinnati Children's Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH (C.D.K.); Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA (A.B.L.); North Carolina Consortium: Duke University, Durham; East Carolina University, Greenville; Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem (S.K.P.); Nemours Cardiac Center, Wilmington, DE (C.P.); Primary Children's Medical Center and University of Utah, Salt Lake City (P.J.G.); Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (A.M.A.); and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania Medical School, Philadelphia (J.W.G.). jane.newburger@cardio.chboston.org.
- Circulation. 2014 May 20;129(20):2013-20.
BackgroundIn the Single Ventricle Reconstruction (SVR) trial, 1-year transplantation-free survival was better for the Norwood procedure with right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery shunt (RVPAS) compared with a modified Blalock-Taussig shunt (MBTS). At 3 years, we compared transplantation-free survival, echocardiographic right ventricular ejection fraction, and unplanned interventions in the treatment groups.Methods And ResultsVital status and medical history were ascertained from annual medical records, death indexes, and phone interviews. The cohort included 549 patients randomized and treated in the SVR trial. Transplantation-free survival for the RVPAS versus MBTS groups did not differ at 3 years (67% versus 61%; P=0.15) or with all available follow-up of 4.8±1.1 years (log-rank P=0.14). Pre-Fontan right ventricular ejection fraction was lower in the RVPAS group than in the MBTS group (41.7±5.1% versus 44.7±6.0%; P=0.007), and right ventricular ejection fraction deteriorated in RVPAS (P=0.004) but not MBTS (P=0.40) subjects (pre-Fontan minus 14-month mean, -3.25±8.24% versus 0.99±8.80%; P=0.009). The RVPAS versus MBTS treatment effect had nonproportional hazards (P=0.004); the hazard ratio favored the RVPAS before 5 months (hazard ratio=0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.88) but the MBTS beyond 1 year (hazard ratio=2.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-4.62). By 3 years, RVPAS subjects had a higher incidence of catheter interventions (P<0.001) with an increasing HR over time (P=0.005): <5 months, 1.14 (95% confidence interval, 0.81-1.60); from 5 months to 1 year, 1.94 (95% confidence interval, 1.02-3.69); and >1 year, 2.48 (95% confidence interval, 1.28-4.80).ConclusionsBy 3 years, the Norwood procedure with RVPAS compared with MBTS was no longer associated with superior transplantation-free survival. Moreover, RVPAS subjects had slightly worse right ventricular ejection fraction and underwent more catheter interventions with increasing hazard ratio over time.Clinical Trial Registration Urlhttp://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00115934.© 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.