• J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. · Dec 1997

    Comparative Study

    Breathing patterns and levels of consciousness in children during administration of nitrous oxide after oral midazolam premedication.

    • R S Litman, J A Kottra, R J Berkowitz, and D S Ward.
    • University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, NY, USA. RLitman@anes.rochester.edu
    • J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 1997 Dec 1;55(12):1372-7; discussion 1378-9.

    PurposeThe combination of midazolam and nitrous oxide is commonly used to achieve sedation and analgesia during pediatric oral procedures, yet there are few, if any, data that illustrate the ventilatory effects of N2O in children, especially when used in combination with additional central nervous system (CNS) depressants. It was hypothesized that the addition of N2O inhalation to oral midazolam premedication would enhance the sedative effects of the midazolam and add analgesia without causing significant respiratory depression. The purpose of this study was to test this hypothesis.Materials And MethodsThirty-four healthy children about to undergo restorative dental treatment under general anesthesia were premedicated with oral midazolam, 0.7 mg/kg, and were then exposed to 40% N2O for 15 minutes after a 5-minute control period. The effect of adding N2O on SpO2, respiratory rate, PETCO2, VT, and VT/TI was examined and the levels of consciousness (conscious vs deep sedation) before and during N2O inhalation were determined.ResultsDuring the course of the study, no child developed hypoxemia (SpO2 < 92%) nor clinically significant upper airway obstruction. Four children who did not develop hypoventilation (defined as PETCO2 > 45 mm Hg) during the control period did so after initiation of N2O. Overall, there were no significant differences in SpO2, PETCO2, VT, or VT/TI between the control and study periods. However, respiratory rates were significantly higher in the first 10 minutes of N2O inhalation when compared with the control period. Before starting N2O administration, 14 children were not clinically sedated, 19 children met the criteria for conscious sedation, and one child met the criteria for deep sedation. At the end of 15 minutes of N2O inhalation, 12 children were not clinically sedated, 17 children met the definition of conscious sedation, three were deeply sedated, and one child had no response to IV insertion, implying a state of general anesthesia. There were no differences in sedation scores between the control and study periods (P = .6). Overall, seven children had an increase in their sedation score while breathing N2O, four had a decrease in their sedation score, and 22 had no change.ConclusionsThe addition of 40% N2O to oral midazolam, 0.7 mg/kg, did not result in clinically meaningful respiratory depression nor upper airway obstruction, but did, in some children, cause an increase in the level of sedation beyond simple conscious sedation.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.