• Surgery · Mar 2003

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of information obtained by operative note abstraction with that recorded on a standardized data collection form.

    • Roberta Scherer, Qi Zhu, Patricia Langenberg, Steven Feldon, Shalom Kelman, Kay Dickersin, and Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Decompression Trial Research Group.
    • University of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Baltimore 21201, USA.
    • Surgery. 2003 Mar 1; 133 (3): 324-30.

    BackgroundThe Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Decompression Trial compared optic nerve decompression surgery with careful follow-up for treatment of patients with nonarteritic ischemic optic neuropathy. Surgeons submitted a standardized data collection form and operative notes for 123 patients randomized to and undergoing surgery. The purpose of this study was to see whether operative notes have sufficient and reliable data to avoid development of a surgery data collection form in future trials.MethodsWe abstracted data from Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Decompression Trial patient operative notes, calculated the proportion of completed responses, and compared abstracted responses with those originally recorded on corresponding case report forms.ResultsVariables used to identify persons, dates, or eye (left/right) were reported 100% of the time on operative notes and with excellent agreement with those recorded on the case report form (median agreement, 100%; range, 95% to 100%). Categoric variables, used to establish the characteristics of surgical steps, were also reported reliably on operative notes (median agreement, 84%; range, 0 to 100%). Open-ended variables tended to be reported more frequently on operative notes (exact agreement, 57% and 34%, respectively, for complications and postoperative medications). Quantitative variables were infrequently reported but correlated well with values reported on the data collection forms (Pearson correlation coefficients, 0.78, 0.79, 0.94, 0.96). For many variables, disagreements were minor and often were related to interpretation of the operative notes by the abstractor.ConclusionIn our trial, operative note abstraction adequately documented surgery date and surgeon and provided more complete information than the standardized report form with respect to complications but did not provide complete information for other variables.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…