• Abby R Rosenberg, Miranda C Bradford, Elizabeth McCauley, CurtisJ RandallJRCambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.Department of Medicine, University of Wash, Joanne Wolfe, K Scott Baker, and Joyce P Yi-Frazier.
• Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
• Cancer. 2018 Oct 1; 124 (19): 3909-3917.

BackgroundAdolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are at risk for poor psychosocial outcomes. This study aimed to determine whether a novel intervention targeting resilience resources would improve patient-reported resilience, quality of life, and psychological distress.MethodsIn this parallel, phase 2 randomized controlled trial, English-speaking AYAs (12-25 years old) with cancer were randomized to the Promoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM) intervention or usual care (UC). PRISM is a brief, skills-based intervention targeting stress management, goal setting, cognitive reframing, and meaning making. Participants completed surveys at enrollment and 6 months. Mixed effects regression models evaluated associations between PRISM and the primary outcome (10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale scores) and secondary outcomes (generic and cancer-related quality of life [Pediatric Quality of Life modules], psychological distress [Kessler-6], and anxiety/depression [Hospital Anxiety and Depression]) at 6 months.ResultsNinety-two AYAs were enrolled, were randomized, and completed baseline surveys (48 in the PRISM group and 44 in the UC group); 73% were 12 to 17 years old, and 62% had leukemia or lymphoma. Attrition was primarily due to medical complications and/or death; 36 PRISM participants and 38 UC participants completed 6-month surveys. PRISM was associated with improved resilience (+3.0 points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-5.4; P = .02) and cancer-specific quality of life (+9.6; 95% CI, 2.6-16.7; P = .01) and reduced psychological distress (-2.1; 95% CI, -4.1 to -0.2; P = .03) but not generic quality of life (+7.2; 95% CI, -0.8 to 15.2; P = .08). Although anxiety was similar between the groups, 2 PRISM participants (6%) and 8 UC participants (21%) met the criteria for depression at 6 months (odds ratio, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-1.09; P = .06).ConclusionsPRISM was associated with improved psychosocial outcomes in comparison with UC, suggesting that brief, skills-based interventions for AYAs may provide a benefit.© 2018 American Cancer Society.

30 keywords...

hide…