• S Recke, R Gansser, J Marienhagen, G Platsch, H Feistel, J Weniger, and J von der Emde.
• University Heart Centre, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.
• J Electrocardiol. 1994 Apr 1; 27 (2): 129-36.

AbstractOn the assumption that maximum R peak time prolongation in the left-sided leads I, V5, or V6 and its time relationship to the S peak time of the maximum S amplitude in leads V1, V2, or V3 (representing dorsally directed forces of ventricular depolarization) could indicate the extent of left ventricular volume overloading and possibly left ventricular systolic function, these variables and the preoperative findings of angiocardiography were compared between patients with chronic mitral incompetence who, late after corrective valve surgery, had either well-preserved radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction (group 1, n = 36) or radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction below 50% (group 2, n = 30). Before surgery, group 2 patients had a highly significant lower mean left ventricular ejection fraction, a highly significant greater mean end-systolic volume index, a significantly greater mean end-diastolic volume index, a significantly greater mean maximum R peak time in leads I, V5, or V6, and a significantly greater prolongation of the maximum R peak time above the S peak time in the right precordial leads, as compared with group 1. R peak times greater than 50 ms or the presence of R peak delay (maximum R peak time greater than the S peak time of the maximum right precordial S amplitude) yields less sensitive but highly reliable results in predicting radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction below 50% with both specificity and positive predictive values of 100%. Thus, in chronic mitral regurgitation surgery should not be delayed if patients present these signs because they are specific markers of irreversibly impaired chamber function.

28 keywords...

hide…