• Gaceta sanitaria · Jan 2018

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    [Assessment of the effectiveness of a proactive and integrated healthcare programme for chronic complex patients].

    • Jordi Coderch, Xavier Pérez-Berruezo, Inma Sánchez-Pérez, Elvira Sánchez, Pere Ibern, Marc Pérez, Marc Carreras, and José M Inoriza.
    • Grup de Recerca en Serveis Sanitaris i Resultats en Salut (GRESSIRES), Palamós (Girona), España; Serveis de Salut Integrats Baix Empordà, Palamós (Girona), España. Electronic address: jcoderch@ssibe.cat.
    • Gac Sanit. 2018 Jan 1; 32 (1): 18-26.

    ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness of a proactive and integrated care programme to adjust the use of health resources by chronic complex patients (CCP) identified as potential high consumers according to a predictive model based on prior use and morbidity.MethodsRandomized controlled clinical trial with three parallel groups of CCP: a blinded control group (GC), usual care; a partial intervention group (GIP) reported in the EMR; a total intervention group (GIT), also reported to primary care (PC). Conducted in an integrated health care organization (IHCO), N=128,281 individuals in 2011. Dependent variables: PC visits, emergency attention, hospitalizations, pharmaceutical cost and death.Independent Variablesintervention group, age, sex, area of residence, morbidity (by clinical risk group) and recurrence as CCP.Statistical AnalysisANOVA, student's t test; logistic and multiple linear regressions at the 95% confidence level.Results4,236 CCP included for the first intervention year and 4,223 for the second; recurrence as CCP 72%. Mean age 73.2 years, 54.2% women and over 70% with 2 or more chronic diseases. The number of PC visits was significantly higher for GIT than for GIP and GC. The hospital stays were significantly lower in GIP. This effect was observed in the first year and in the second year only in the new CCP. The general indicators of the IHCO were good, before and during the intervention.ConclusionsA high standard of quality, previous and during the study, and the inevitable contamination between groups, hindered the assessment of the marginal effectiveness of the program.Copyright © 2016 SESPAS. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.