• Chest · Dec 2021

    Multicenter Study

    Neonatal lung ultrasound and surfactant administration: a pragmatic, multicenter study.

    • Francesco Raimondi, Fiorella Migliaro, Iuri Corsini, Fabio Meneghin, Luca Pierri, Serena Salomè, Alessandro Perri, Salvatore Aversa, Stefano Nobile, Silvia Lama, Silvia Varano, Marilena Savoia, Sara Gatto, Valentina Leonardi, Letizia Capasso, Virgilio Paolo Carnielli, Fabio Mosca, Carlo Dani, Giovanni Vento, Pasquale Dolce, and Gianluca Lista.
    • Division of Neonatology and Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Università"Federico II" di Napoli, Naples, Italy. Electronic address: raimondi@unina.it.
    • Chest. 2021 Dec 1; 160 (6): 2178-2186.

    BackgroundPrevious research shows that a lung ultrasound score (LUS) can anticipate CPAP failure in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.Research QuestionCan LUS also predict the need for surfactant replacement?Study Design And MethodsMulticenter, pragmatic study of preterm neonates who underwent lung ultrasound at birth and those given surfactant by masked physicians, who also were scanned within 24 h from administration. Clinical data and respiratory support variables were recorded. Accuracy of LUS, oxygen saturation to Fio2 ratio, Fio2, and Silverman score for surfactant administration were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves. The simultaneous prognostic values of LUS and oxygen saturation to Fio2 ratio for surfactant administration, adjusting for gestational age (GA), were analyzed through a logistic regression model.ResultsTwo hundred forty infants were enrolled. One hundred eight received at least one dose of surfactant. LUS predicted the first surfactant administration with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.81-0.91), cut off of 9, sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.70-0.86), specificity of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.76-0.89), positive predictive value of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.71-0.87), negative predictive value of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.75-0.89), positive likelihood ratio of 4.65 (95% CI, 3.14-6.89), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.26 (95% CI, 0.18-0.37). No significant difference was shown among different GA groups: 25 to 27 weeks' GA (AUC, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.99), 28 to 30 weeks' GA (AUC, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72-0.91), and 31 to 33 weeks' GA (AUC, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.95), respectively. LUS declined significantly within 24 h in infants receiving one surfactant dose. When comparing Fio2, oxygen saturation to Fio2 ratio, LUS, and Silverman scores as criteria for surfactant administration, only the latter showed a significantly poorer performance. The combination of oxygen saturation to Fio2 ratio and LUS showed the highest predictive power, with an AUC of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.89-0.97), regardless of the GA interval.InterpretationLUS is a reliable criterion to administer the first surfactant dose regardless of GA. Its association with oxygen saturation to Fio2 ratio significantly improves the prediction power for surfactant need.Copyright © 2021 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.