• Das Gesundheitswesen · Apr 1996

    [Evaluation of the educational curriculum in psychosocial fields and general medicine in human medicine subjects--results of a total Germany pilot study in the 1995 summer semester].

    • U Stössel, E Brähler, J G Gostomzyk, M M Kochen, J von Troschke, K Wildgrube, and M Wirsching.
    • Im Auftrag der Arbeitsgruppe psychosoziales Currikulum der wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaften.
    • Gesundheitswesen. 1996 Apr 1; 58 (4): 249-52.

    AbstractWith the discussion of the quality of medical education in Germany the importance of evaluating the curriculum has grown. A working group of representatives of the German scientific societies for general medicine and the so-called "psychosocial" disciplines in medical education had adapted a questionnaire from Harvard Medical School and tested this version for the first time in summer 1995. 56 teachers and 1250 students took part in this pilot study. The instrument proved to be sufficiently valid to evaluate the quality of different types of teaching lessons. The disciplines (Medical Sociology, Medical Psychology, Social Medicine, General Medicine, Psychotherapy/Psychosomatics) were valued equally with concern to their relevance for medical education. They got significantly better values for quality of teaching and teaching engagement of the professors. It is recommended to notice these results in the actual debate on the reform of the medical curriculum and to include other disciplines in further evaluative investigations.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…