• Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue · May 2012

    [Significance of serum procalcitonin levels in the evaluation of severity and prognosis of patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome].

    • Wei-ping Huang, Wen-qiang Jiang, Bei Hu, Heng Ye, and Hong-ke Zeng.
    • Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China.
    • Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2012 May 1;24(5):294-7.

    ObjectiveTo observe the dynamic changes in serum procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and white blood cell (WBC) count in systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and their implication in assessment of illness severity and prognosis.MethodsA prospective case control study was conducted. Seventy-two patients with SIRS in Guangdong General Hospital were enrolled in intensive care unit (ICU) from May, 2010 to June, 2011. Parameters including PCT, CRP, and WBC count were determined on the 1st, 3rd, and 5th day after admission. The patients were divided into septic group (n=49) and non-septic group (non-infectious SIRS group, n=23) according to the presence or absence of infectious. Dynamic changes in all parameters were compared between the two groups and correlation analysis was carried out on the basis of differential indexes and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA). The clinical outcome within 28 days after admission to ICU was observed, and the patients were divided into death group (n=19) and survival group (n=53). Dynamic changes in all parameters between the two groups were compared. Relevant parameters were analyzed with area under receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve, AUC) to predict 28-day survival. Logistic regression analysis of the multiple factors was used to screen independent risk factors for predicting death.ResultsPCT level (μg/L) on 1st, 3rd, 5th day after admission were all significantly higher in septic group than those in non-septic group (1st day: 2.5±0.3 vs. 0.9±0.2, 3rd day: 1.9±0.3 vs. 0.6±0.2, 5th day: 0.9±0.1 vs. 0.5±0.1, all P<0.05), while there was no statistically significant difference in CRP and WBC between two groups. PCT level in septic group was gradually decreased with time, there were statistically significant differences between septic group and non-septic group at the different treatment time (all P<0.05), but there was no correlation between PCT and treatment duration in non-septic group. Positive statistical correlation was found between PCT and SOFA score (r=0.979, P<0.05). PCT (μg/L) and CRP levels (mg/L) on 1st, 3rd, 5th day were significantly higher in death group than those of survival group (PCT on 1st day: 2.0±0.8 vs. 0.8±0.3, 3rd day: 2.2±0.7 vs. 0.6±0.3, 5th day: 2.4±1.0 vs. 0.4±0.1; CRP on 1st day: 422±45 vs. 411±44, 3rd day: 418±39 vs. 403±52, 5th day: 392±38 vs. 382±46, all P<0.05), but WBC count showed no statistically significant difference between two groups. PCT level in survival group showed a significant lowering along with treatment duration, and statistical difference was seen by paired comparison between every two time-points (all P<0.05). There was no correlation between PCT level and treatment duration in death group, and it maintained a rather high level. No significant difference was seen in CRP and WBC between two groups with passage of time. AUC was 0.824 and 0.720, respectively, when patient's 28-day survival was predicted by PCT and CRP (both P<0.01). Logistic regression analysis of the multiple factors revealed that PCT>2.23 μg/L was independent risk factor predicting the prognosis [odds ratio (OR) was 1.773, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 1.033 to 3.214, P=0.015].ConclusionsSerum PCT evaluation may be helpful in differentiating sepsis and non-sepsis at early stage of disease, and also in predicting the severity of the illness and prognosis of SIRS. PCT may be one of the independent risk factors for 28-day survival.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,704,841 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.