• Bulletin du cancer · Aug 1997

    Review Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    [Value of the combination of oral ondansetron with methylprednisolone as soon as the first cure in mild emetogenic chemotherapy. Groupe français d'étude de l'ondansétron].

    • B Coiffier, D Khayat, J L Misset, and B Votan.
    • Centre hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France.
    • Bull Cancer. 1997 Aug 1; 84 (8): 781-7.

    AbstractThis multicentre randomized single-blind parallel group study compared the efficacy of oral ondansetron plus methylprednisolone (OND+MPS) with conventional antiemetic strategies (TH) over 4 consecutive courses in moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. This study was conducted in naive patients receiving a minimum of 3 cytotoxics including adriamycin (> or = 35 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (> or = 500 mg/m2) plus an other alkylating agent. Of the 364 patients included in the study, 70% had a breast cancer and 30% a lymphoma. Patients were divided into two groups. On day 1, one group of patients received OND (8 mg, po) 2 hours before chemotherapy, followed by a slow intravenous injection of MPS (120 mg) 30 minutes before chemotherapy. Eight hours after the start of chemotherapy, patients received OND (8 mg, po) and MPS (16 mg, po). On days 2-4, patients received OND (8 mg, po) and MPS (16 mg, po) twice daily. The second group of patients received conventional antiemetic treatment (benzamide plus corticosteroids with or without benzodiazepins). The primary efficacy parameter was defined as complete control of emesis (0 emetic episodes) over 4 consecutive courses of chemotherapy. In the OND+MPS group, 63% of patients experienced complete control of emesis versus 33% in the TH group (p < 0.001). The secondary parameters (percentage of days with no emetic episodes, control of emetic episodes, grade of nausea at each course, patient preference and quality of life evaluation) were always significantly better in the OND+MPS treated group. The percentage of days without any emetic episode over the 4 courses of chemotherapy was 91% in the OND+MPS group and 75% in the TH group (p < 0.001). Ninety-two percent of patients from OND+MPS group preferred to continue their treatment versus 76% in the TH group (p < 0.001). Concerning the quality of life assessed by FLIC and FLIE questionnaires, the analysis showed a significant difference at the end of the treatment in favor of OND+MPS (p = 0.037 and 0.0075 respectively). This study showed the interest in using the combination OND+MPS right from the first course of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…