• Magn Reson Med · Oct 2008

    Comparative Study

    Comparative reliability of proton spectroscopy techniques designed to improve detection of J-coupled metabolites.

    • Paul Gerald Mullins, Hongji Chen, Jing Xu, Arvind Caprihan, and Charles Gasparovic.
    • Bangor Imaging Center, School of Psychology, Bangor University, Gwynedd, United Kingdom. p.mullins@bangor.ac.uk
    • Magn Reson Med. 2008 Oct 1; 60 (4): 964-9.

    AbstractImproved detection of J-coupled neurometabolites through the use of modified proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) techniques has recently been reported. TE-averaged point-resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) uses the J modulation effects by averaging FIDs with differing echo times to improve detection of glutamate, while standard PRESS detection of glutamate can be improved by using an appropriate single echo determined from J-modulation simulations. In the present study, the reliabilities of TE-averaged PRESS, standard PRESS with TE = 40 ms, and standard PRESS with TE = 30 ms in detecting metabolite levels in the cingulate gyrus of the human brain at 3T were compared in six subjects. TE-averaged PRESS measures showed a mean variability of 9% for N-acetyl aspartate, choline, and creatine, compared with < 4% for the 30- and 40-ms PRESS techniques. The coefficients of variation for glutamate were 10%, 7%, and 5% for TE-averaged, 30-ms, and 40-ms PRESS, respectively. PRESS with a TE of 40 ms also demonstrated improved reliability for GABA and glutamine concentrations. These results show that with the appropriate selection of echo time standard PRESS can be a reliable (1)H-MRS technique for the measurement of J-coupled neurometabolites in the human brain and, moreover, compares favorably with at least one J-edited technique.(c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.