• Ophthalmology · Mar 2019

    Differing Structural and Functional Patterns of Optic Nerve Damage in Multiple Sclerosis and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder.

    • Ting Shen, Yuyi You, Sukanya Arunachalam, Ariadna Fontes, Sidong Liu, Vivek Gupta, John Parratt, Chenyu Wang, Michael Barnett, Joshua Barton, Nitin Chitranshi, Ling Zhu, Clare L Fraser, Stuart L Graham, Alexander Klistorner, and Con Yiannikas.
    • Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
    • Ophthalmology. 2019 Mar 1; 126 (3): 445-453.

    PurposeTo assess differential patterns of axonal loss and demyelination in the optic nerve in multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD).DesignCross-sectional study.ParticipantsOne hundred ninety-two participants, including 136 MS patients (272 eyes), 19 NMOSD patients (38 eyes), and 37 healthy control participants (74 eyes).MethodsAll participants underwent spectral-domain OCT scans and multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) recordings. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the diffusion protocol also was performed in all patients.Main Outcome MeasuresGanglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness and mfVEP amplitude and latency at 5 eccentricities; global and temporal retinal nerve fiber layer thickness.ResultsIn optic neuritis (ON) eyes, the NMOSD patients had more severe GCIPL loss (P < 0.001) and mfVEP amplitude reduction (P < 0.001) compared with MS patients, whereas in contrast, mfVEP latency delay was more evident in MS patients (P < 0.001). The NMOSD patients showed more morphologic and functional loss at the foveal to parafoveal region, whereas the MS patients showed evenly distributed damage at the macula. Correlation analysis demonstrated a strong structure-function (OCT-mfVEP) association in the NMOSD patients, which was only moderate in the MS patients. In non-ON (NON) eyes, the MS patients showed significantly thinner GCIPL than controls (P < 0.001), whereas no GCIPL loss was observed in NON eyes in NMOSD. In addition, a significant correlation was found between all OCT and mfVEP measures in MS patients, but not in NMOSD patients. MRI demonstrated significant lesional load in the optic radiation in MS compared to NMOSD eyes (P = 0.002), which was related to the above OCT and mfVEP changes in NON eyes.ConclusionsOur study demonstrated different patterns of ON damage in NMOSD and MS. In MS, the ON damage was less severe, with demyelination as the main pathologic component, whereas in NMOSD, axonal loss was more severe compared with myelin loss. The disproportional mfVEP amplitude and latency changes suggested predominant axonal damage within the anterior visual pathway as the main clinical feature of NMOSD, in contrast to MS, where demyelination spreads along the entire visual pathway.Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…