• Lena M Napolitano.
• Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, University Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
• Expert Rev Hematol. 2021 Feb 1; 14 (2): 219-239.

IntroductionAcute hemorrhage is a global healthcare issue, and remains the leading preventable cause of death in trauma. Acute severe hemorrhage can be related to traumatic, peripartum, gastrointestinal, and procedural causes. Hemostatic defects occur early in patients requiring massive transfusion. Early recognition and treatment of hemorrhage and hemostatic defects are required to save lives and to achieve optimal patient outcomes.Areas CoveredThis review discusses current evidence and trials aimed at identifying the optimal treatment for hemostatic defects in hemorrhage and massive transfusion. Literature search included PubMed and Embase.Expert OpinionPatients with acute hemorrhage requiring massive transfusion commonly develop coagulopathy due to specific hemostatic defects, and accurate diagnosis and prompt correction are required for definitive hemorrhage control. Damage control resuscitation and massive transfusion protocols are optimal initial treatment strategies, followed by goal-directed individualized resuscitation using real-time coagulation monitoring. Distinct phenotypes exist in trauma-induced coagulopathy, including 'Bleeding' or 'Thrombotic' phenotypes, and hyperfibrinolysis vs. fibrinolysis shutdown. The trauma 'lethal triad' (hypothermia, coagulopathy, acidosis) has been updated to the 'lethal diamond' (including hypocalcemia). A number of controversies in optimal management exist, including whole blood vs. component therapy, use of factor concentrates vs. blood products, optimal use of tranexamic acid, and prehospital plasma and tranexamic acid administration.

13 keywords...

hide…