• J Surg Educ · May 2019

    Obstacles Affecting the Implementation of the O-SCORE for Assessment of Orthopedic Surgical Skills Competency.

    • Gabriella E Ode, Joseph Stewart Buck, Meghan Wally, Brian P Scannell, and Joshua C Patt.
    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina. Electronic address: gabriellaode@gmail.com.
    • J Surg Educ. 2019 May 1; 76 (3): 881-892.

    ObjectivesThere is a need for meaningful and reliable measures of surgical competency in residency education. The goal of the current study is to incorporate the Ottawa Surgical Competency Operating Room Evaluation (O-SCORE) into the process of resident evaluation at our institution and to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of its use through a web-based platform.DesignThis is a feasibility study that prospectively assesses the implementation of a web-based O-SCORE at our institution. Over a 16-week period, 19 orthopedic surgery residents (PGY2-PGY5) participated in a quality improvement study, which involved collecting 2 feedback forms per week. Each form consisted of a resident form and a linked attending form. At the conclusion of the 16-week trial period, residents and faculty members were asked to complete a survey about their perceptions of the O-SCORE program.SettingAn academic medical center.ParticipantsThe study included only residents in postgraduate training years (PGY) 2 through 5 (n = 20) and attendings (n = 37).ResultsDuring the 16-week study period, 608 resident surveys were requested for the 19 participating residents, of which 404 surveys (66.5%) were completed. Faculty completed 207 of 326 surveys for an overall compliance rate of 63.5%. The O-SCORE was able to significantly differentiate between all training years (p < 0.0001) with the exception of PGY3 residents when compared to PGY4 residents. Overall, residents and faculty found the program valuable and feasible. Resident and faculty perception of the value of the O-SCORE correlated with compliance rate of the O-SCORE surveys.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that implementation of an immediate feedback program utilizing an electronic platform is achievable and offers reproducible construct validity. However, issues affecting compliance among both residents and faculty physicians must temper optimism for the program and should be systematically addressed to allow for successful implementation.Copyright © 2018 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.