-
- J Valentino, M B Donnelly, D A Sloan, R W Schwartz, and R C Haydon.
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, USA. jvale00@pop.uky.edu
- Acad Med. 1998 Feb 1; 73 (2): 204-5.
PurposeTo measure the agreement among faculty members about the importance of items on a checklist used to grade an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) station.MethodsSix faculty members rated the importance of 47 items for an OSCE station in which students took the history of a patient with sore throat and hoarseness.ResultsOf the 47 items, the raters independently identified 15 items as very important. The reliability of each individual rater was fair (averaged value of alpha = .63.) The reliability of the mean rating of the six raters was high (alpha = .91).ConclusionsThe results strongly suggest that when a group of faculty members cooperatively identifies the important items to be included in an OSCE checklist, the reliability of the checklist is superior to one created by a single author.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.