• Obstetrics and gynecology · Apr 2007

    Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor.

    • James M Alexander, Kenneth J Leveno, Dwight J Rouse, Mark B Landon, Sharon Gilbert, Catherine Y Spong, Michael W Varner, Atef H Moawad, Steve N Caritis, Margaret Harper, Ronald J Wapner, Yoram Sorokin, Menachem Miodovnik, Mary J O'Sullivan, Baha M Sibai, Oded Langer, Steven G Gabbe, and National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network (MFMU).
    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235-9032, USA. james.alexander@utsouthwestern.edu
    • Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Apr 1;109(4):917-21.

    ObjectiveTo compare maternal and neonatal outcomes when primary cesarean delivery is performed in the second stage of labor compared with the first stage.MethodsBetween January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2000, a prospective observational study of primary cesarean deliveries was conducted at 13 university centers comprising the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. The primary outcomes of interest included a maternal composite (composed of at least one of the following: endometritis, intraoperative surgical complication, blood transfusion, or wound complication) and neonatal composite (which included at least one of the following: Apgar score of 3 or less at 5 minutes, neonatal death, neonatal intensive care unit admission, seizure, delivery room intubation in the absence of meconium, or fetal injury).ResultsA total of 11,981 cesarean deliveries were available for analysis: 9,265 were performed in the first stage and 2,716 in the second stage. Cesarean deliveries performed in the second stage were associated with longer operative times, epidural analgesia, chorioamnionitis, and higher birth weight (all P<.001). The maternal composite index was slightly increased in women undergoing cesarean delivery in the second stage of labor, primarily due to uterine atony, uterine incision extension, and incidental cystotomy. This difference was significant after multivariable analysis (odds ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.07-1.37). After multivariable analysis, the neonatal composite did not differ significantly between groups (odds ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.84-1.08).ConclusionCesarean delivery in the second stage of labor is associated with slightly increased maternal but not neonatal composite morbidity.Level Of EvidenceII.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…