• Brennan Spiegel, Roger Bolus, Amar A Desai, Philip Zagar, Tom Parker, John Moran, Matthew D Solomon, Osman Khawar, Matthew Gitlin, Jennifer Talley, and Allen Nissenson.
• Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA. bspiegel@mednet.ucla.edu
• Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Nov 1; 5 (11): 2024-33.

Background And ObjectivesMortality rates vary widely among dialysis facilities even after adjustment with standardized mortality ratios (SMRs). This variation may occur because top-performing facilities use practices not shared by others, because the SMR fails to capture key patient characteristics, or both. Practices were identified that distinguish top- from bottom-performing facilities by SMR.Design, Setting, Participants, & MeasurementsA cross-sectional survey was performed of staff across three organizations. Staff members rated the perceived quality of their units' patient-, provider-, and facility-level practices using a six-point Likert scale. Facilities were divided into those with above- versus below-expected mortality on the basis of SMRs from U.S. Renal Data Service facility reports. Mean Likert scores were computed for each practice using t tests. Practices that were statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05) and achieved at least a medium effect size of ≥0.4 were reported. Significant predictors were entered into a linear regression model.ResultsDialysis facilities with below-expected mortality reported that patients in their unit were more activated and engaged, physician communication and interpersonal relationships were stronger, dieticians were more resourceful and knowledgeable, and overall coordination and staff management were superior versus facilities with above-expected mortality. Staff ratings of these practices explained 31% of the variance in SMRs.ConclusionsPatient-, provider-, and facility-level practices partly explain SMR variation among facilities. Improving SMRs may require processes that reflect a coordinated, multidisciplinary environment (i.e., no one group, practice, or characteristic will drive facility-level SMRs). Understanding and improving SMRs will require a holistic view of the facility.

33 keywords...

hide…