• J Orthop Trauma · Mar 1998

    Long-term functional prognosis of posterior injuries in high-energy pelvic disruption.

    • F H Dujardin, M Hossenbaccus, F Duparc, N Biga, and J M Thomine.
    • Orthopaedic Department, GRHAL, University of Rouen Hospital, France.
    • J Orthop Trauma. 1998 Mar 1;12(3):145-50; discussion 150-1.

    ObjectiveThis study sought to identify the long-term functional results of various posterior pelvic lesions and to determine whether such injuries benefit from exact reduction.DesignConsecutive cohort of patients admitted for pelvic disruption between 1980 and 1990.SettingUniversity hospital.PatientsEighty-eight pelvic fractures in eighty-eight patients were classified according to the instability and anatomy of the posterior injury. Simple fractures of the pubic rami, minimally displaced fractures with pubic diastasis of less than 2.5 centimeters, and fractures without other pelvic lesions (type B1 lesions, stage 1 in the Tile classification) were all excluded. Patients with sequelae of associated lesions that could render functional evaluation difficult were also excluded.InterventionsThe initial status of the patient and the type of fracture determined the treatment. In the anteroposterior compression injuries group, an external fixator using the double-frame Hoffmann device was applied in twenty-eight cases to reduce a large external horizontal displacement, either immediately to control bleeding or later as definitive treatment when anterior internal fixation was not possible. Anterior internal fixation with a plate was used six times to repair a symphyseal disruption. In vertical shear injuries, tibial skeletal traction was used for six weeks as an attempt to stabilize vertical instability. In ten patients, traction alone was used. In other cases, traction was used in conjunction with an external fixator or internal pubic fixation. In impacted lateral compression injuries, simple bed rest for six weeks was used in cases of stable lesions. Skeletal traction was applied in ten patients of this group because of a potential vertical instability, particularly in cases with a comminuted sacral lesion.Main Outcome MeasuresAnatomic diagnosis and evaluation of the reduction were made using anteroposterior, inlet, and outlet radiographs of the pelvic ring. To assess reduction, vertical, anteroposterior, and rotatory displacement was measured. Functional results were qualified based on the injury pattern and the quality of the final reduction and were then quantified according to the grading proposed by Majeed.ResultsFunctional results varied according to injury anatomy, with fractures of the iliac wing and sacroiliac (SI) fracture-dislocations having the best prognosis. The quality of reduction did not affect the functional results. Conservative methods such as skeletal traction and external fixation generally gave satisfactory functional results. Conversely, however, pure SI lesions were associated with poor functional results, especially if reduction was not exact.ConclusionsThis study shows that when the posterior injury is a fracture of the iliac wing or a mixed fracture with SI propagation, a long-term satisfactory functional result can be obtained without an exact reduction even in cases of vertical instability. Simple methods are usually sufficient, and it seems unnecessary to propose more aggressive treatment. It is important, however, to recognize that SI fracture-dislocations (17 percent in this series) seem to be quite different from pure SI disruptions in terms of persistent pain. Moreover, it appears that exact reduction of pure SI lesions is critical for good functional results, something that is difficult to obtain with conservative procedures. Sacral fractures represent a special problem for the surgeon because of the frequency of fair results in which neurologic lesions whose pathophysiology is poorly known seem to be responsible.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…