• Rev Bras Enferm · Jan 2018

    Validity and reliability of the Brazilian version of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment.

    • MotaFernanda Rochelly do NascimentoFRDNUniversidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil., Janaína Fonseca Victor, SilvaMaria Josefina daMJDUniversidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil., Edson Silva Soares, OriáMônica Oliveira BatistaMOBUniversidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil., Marília Braga Marques, Maria Célia de Freitas, and Allana Mirella Alves.
    • Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
    • Rev Bras Enferm. 2018 Jan 1; 71 Suppl 2: 827-834.

    ObjectiveTo analyze the validity based on the internal structure and reliability of the Brazilian version of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA) applied to informal caregivers of dependent elderly.MethodA methodological study with 120 informal caregivers of the elderly. Validity based on the internal structure evaluated by exploratory factorial analysis, with extraction of main factorial axes, varimax orthogonal rotation and retention of factors by parallel analysis. Reliability assessed by Cronbach's alpha.ResultsThe instrument revealed a factorial structure different from the original version: three factors were identified, equivalent to subscales, self-esteem, daily activities and family support, with explained variance of 42%. The values of the Cronbach alpha for the items belonging to each subscale were, respectively: 0.71, 0.81 and 0.83.ConclusionThe Brazilian version of CRA presents good evidence of validity based on internal structure and is reliable, and can be used to assess the overload of informal caregivers of dependent elderly.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.