• B Joseph Guglielmo, David J Edwards, Andrea S Franks, Cynthia A Naughton, Kristine S Schonder, Pamela L Stamm, Phillip Thornton, and Nicholas G Popovich.
• School of Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, 94143-0622, USA. guglielmoj@pharmacy.ucsf.edu
• Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Aug 10; 75 (6): 122.

AbstractThe 2009-2010 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) Council of Faculties Faculty Affairs Committee reviewed published literature assessing the scope and outcomes of faculty development for tenure and promotion. Relevant articles were identified via a PubMed search, review of pharmacy education journals, and identification of position papers from major healthcare professions academic organizations. While programs intended to enhance faculty development were described by some healthcare professions, relatively little specific to pharmacy has been published and none of the healthcare professions have adequately evaluated the impact of various faculty-development programs on associated outcomes.The paucity of published information strongly suggests a lack of outcomes-oriented faculty-development programs in colleges and schools of pharmacy. Substantial steps are required toward the development and scholarly evaluation of faculty-development programs. As these programs are developed and assessed, evaluations must encompass all faculty subgroups, including tenure- and nontenure track faculty members, volunteer faculty members, women, and underrepresented minorities. This paper proposes AACP, college and school, and department-level recommendations intended to ensure faculty success in achieving tenure and promotion.

12 keywords...

hide…